11 Jun 2007

China and Free Trade

Sorry, I guess I'm on a free-trade kick this evening:

The BBC mentions the following report on Chinese labor standards published today by the campaigning alliance Playfair. I must say that one should be a little skeptical of an alleged research organization that is actually funded by a confederation of trade unions under the "fair trade" banner.

I notice that these Western organizations only find time for "awareness" when the working conditions are in factories producing Olympics merchandise. I also find it interesting that there are no voices of Chinese workers calling addressing workplace law violation: only Western campaigners speaking on their behalf. Much like how the Chinese Communist Party speaks for the workers' interests...

I am sure work in a Chinese factory is intense, with long hours, forced overtime, and perhaps even labor with children as young as 12. But as James Fallows points out in his excellent piece on Chinese industry in Shenzhen, Chinese peasants willingly leave their families and drudging agricultural toil behind to work in such jobs. They save money for a few years and then often return home in the hope of starting businesses. This is a hard life, but its the life of millions of people striving for and building a richer future through industrial revolution, just has America and the West did a century and a half ago. Fallows also mentions that Western campaigners have a tendency to misinterpret Chinese labor conditions, like when campaigners see computer assemblywomen grounded with wires to prevent static electricity buildups and think that they are chained to their stations as slave labor. Nor do these same campaigners seem to have much to say about non-export industries, like when 33 workers were incinerated at a government steel plant because of faulty equipment.

Those concerned about working conditions in China would better spend their energies supporting the Chinese themselves in building a society and legal system that better protects property and civil rights. If Chinese workers were free to organize for themselves outside of the Communist Party structure, they certainly would not need meddling foreigners deciding which of their workplaces were bad for them.

2 comments:

Pace said...

One thing I took from my studies of Chinese History is that China as a collective is interested in learning lessons from the West, but does not appreciate being told what to do or how to run itself. If pushed, they will rebel. Outsiders can come to control China, but only by becoming Chinese and working from within and therefore achieving legitimacy as in the Yuan or the Qing. China most certainly does need to work on its labour standards and civil rights, but pressure from the West will not bring this about. The Chinese themselves will adopt these standards in their own time, and when they do, the results will be dramatic.

Andrew Killilea-Moore said...

Well, to be FAIR - many of these peasants are coming to the cities because the opportunities for supporting themselves are dwindling in the rural areas due to a combination of policy changes, environmental degradation, active government interference and the increasing unrest in the countryside.

As history has shown, most peasants don't usually leave their farms and move to the cities because they think they can strike it rich (although some undeniably do), they usually do it because they no longer continue as farmers. Let's not forget, the first country that witnessed such a mass migration was England, and that was primarily fueled by the Enclosure Acts (which were bloodily contested by the serfs and peasants). In the end, the peasants lost out to the short-sighted interests of the landed aristocracy, who in turn were overthrown by the descendants of the peasants they evicted from their lands.

History is not without a certain sense of irony...